We wanted to inform you about the violations of law in a court case in Turkey over Adnan Oktar and his friends. The case has 236 defendants (83 of whom are still in jail), whose characters have been assassinated by the media since the day
THE IRREGULARITIES AND UNLAWFUL PROCEEDINGS ATTORNEY EŞREF NURI YAKISAN HAS ENCOUNTERED IN HIS ACTING AS A LAWYER IN THE CASE FILE NUMBERED 2019/313 OF ADNAN OKTAR AND HIS FRIENDS
The following case regarding Attorney Esref Nuri Yakisan, who has been acting as a defense counsel in
This is an explanation regarding the January 11 court sentence against Mr. Adnan Oktar, Istanbul, Turkey, who is sentenced to 9,803 years. Actually this decision of the court caused a great stir among the jurists. All lawyers and professors who submitted their scientific opinion on
On November 13, 2020, the Prosecutor's Office issued its opinion on the merits of the case of Adnan Oktar and his friends. The defendants, who had been given only 2 weeks to prepare their defenses, began to plead their cases on November 30. As we
In the scope of the lawsuit known as the "Adnan Oktar Case", sadly, many illegal violations have been experienced since the investigation stage. One of these is the policy of intimidation and coercion applied to defense lawyers.
Some of the defense counsels in this lawsuit are
Below you can find highlights from the defense made by defense attorneys in July, 2020:
An extensive investigation and police operation was held against Mr. Adnan Oktar and his friends in 1999 with the same allegations and the accused were acquitted from all of the charges.
An investigation and a public case was filed against a defense attorney in our lawsuit on charges of being a member of the alleged criminal organization, and based on an imaginary incident of conveying greetings of Mr. Adnan Oktar to an attorney of the complainants,
1. Recently, in July 2020, an investigation was launched and a public case was filed against a defense attorney on charges of “being a member of the alleged criminal organization” because of his professional duties as a lawyer, and of “threatening by taking advantage of